PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN HUKUM PENJUAL ATAS PERJANJIAN JUAL BELI RUMAH YANG SERTIFIKATNYA DIJAMINKAN DI BANK TANPA PEMBERITAHUAN KEPADA PEMBELI

Authors

  • Fioletta Izzah Insyirah Universitas Pamulang
  • Uswatun Hasanah Universitas Pamulang
  • Muhamad Abdul Umar Universitas Pamulang
  • Mochamad Sullaiman Universitas Pamulang
  • Dede Ika Murofikoh Universitas Pamulang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69957/cr.v5i06.2556

Keywords:

Pertanggungjawaban Hukum, Jual Beli Rumah, Sertifikat Hak Milik, Hak Tanggungan, Itikad Baik, Perlindungan Hukum Pembeli

Abstract

There is a problem of the seller's legal responsibility in the house sale and purchase agreement when the title certificate is pledged to the bank without informing the buyer. This research is based on the Civil Code (KUHPerdata) and Law Number 4 of 1996 concerning the Rights of Dependents. Secretly mandating certificates is considered a violation of the principle of good faith, as stipulated in Article 1338 paragraph (3) of the Civil Code, and contrary to Article 10 paragraph (1) of the Law on the Rights of Dependents which forces transparency and registration of the rights of dependents. This study uses a normative juridical method with a legislative approach, decision analysis, and academic literature review. The results of the study stated that sellers can be subject to civil liability based on the principle of default or unlawful acts because the object of sale and purchase is no longer free from the burden of dependents. The Supreme Court's Decision Number 751 PK/Pdt/2019 shows that buyers who have fulfilled their obligations under the Sale and Purchase Agreement (PPJB) continue to suffer losses due to certificates that are pledged without a permit, so that the process of the Deed of Sale and Purchase (AJB) is hampered and has the potential to be auctioned. Analysis from various studies, such as the work of Martha & Fadillah (2020), Nursanti & Fadjriani (2021), and Jennis (2022), confirms that non-disclosure related to dependent rights violates the principles of transparency and protection for buyers. This study concludes that increased legal supervision and education in property transactions is needed to prevent the misuse of certificates and ensure good legal protection for buyers.

References

Badrulzaman, Mariam Darus., Kompilasi Hukum Perikatan. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2015.

Harsono, Boedi. Hukum Agraria Indonesia: Sejarah Pembentukan UndangUndang Pokok Agraria, Isi dan Pelaksanaannya. Jakarta: Djambatan, 2008.

Soekanto, Soerjono dan Sri Mamudji. Penelitian Hukum Normatif (Suatu Tinjauan Singkat). Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2014.

Subekti., Hukum Perjanjian. Jakarta: Intermasa, 2002.

Arjaya, I Made, Ni Komang Mahyuni Gita Paramita, dan I Made Suwitra. “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pembeli Berdasarkan Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli (PPJB).” Jurnal Tuturan, Vol. 9 No. 1, 2020.

Fauzansyah, T., A. Yahya, dan I. Jauhari. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Konsumen Pembelian Rumah Melalui PPJB.” Jurnal IUS, Vol. 8 No. 3, 2020.

Askar, Askar. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pembeli Beritikad Baik dalam Sengketa Hak Atas Tanah.” Jurnal Legalitas, Vol. 5 No. 2, 2019.

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (Burgerlijk Wetboek).

Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 1996 tentang Hak Tanggungan atas Tanah dan Benda-Benda yang Berkaitan dengan Tanah.

Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 tentang Pendaftaran Tanah.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-20

How to Cite

Insyirah, F. I., Hasanah, U. ., Umar, M. A., Sullaiman, M., & Murofikoh, D. I. (2025). PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN HUKUM PENJUAL ATAS PERJANJIAN JUAL BELI RUMAH YANG SERTIFIKATNYA DIJAMINKAN DI BANK TANPA PEMBERITAHUAN KEPADA PEMBELI. COURT REVIEW: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum (e-ISSN: 2776-1916), 5(06), 407–412. https://doi.org/10.69957/cr.v5i06.2556

Issue

Section

HUKUM PERDATA